There has been an alarming increase in caravan thefts across the nation in recent times. This trend is mainly a result of a vehicle shortage and an escalating demand for leisure vehicles. A number of incidents were reported in September 2024, illustrating the growing nature of this issue.
In North Yorkshire, the police are actively investigating the theft of a Swift Elegance caravan from a property located near the A63 in Selby. The caravan was stolen during the late night, and authorities are appealing for witnesses or dashcam footage to support their investigation.
Similarly, in Scotland, a Lunar Quasar caravan was reported missing after being stolen from a property in Radford, prompting the police to call upon the public for any information that may aid in resolving the case.
Police are urging caravan owners to take proactive steps in enhancing their security, particularly through the installation of GPS tracking devices. These devices not only increase the likelihood of a quick recovery of stolen caravans but are also instrumental in identifying the culprits behind the recent uptick in thefts. A recent case from Lincolnshire serves as a pertinent example, where a suspect was arrested after police promptly recovered a stolen caravan from the A1. The recovery occurred within 30 minutes of the theft, thanks to the GPS tracker that was fitted to
This wave of thefts brings to light the necessity of being alert and taking appropriate precautions to safeguard your valuable leisure vehicles. Even if your caravan is fitted with a factory-installed tracker, it is beneficial to consider the installation of an additional hidden, battery-powered tracker, like the Back2you Caravan Tracker. Professional thieves are often familiar with the locations of factory-installed trackers and can easily disable them
It is likely that you have read about the implementation of GPS blocking tools by habitual criminals or employees who are opposed to their managers' oversight.
GPS jammers operate by creating a white noise radio signal that transmits on the same frequency as GPS satellites, which can disrupt the signals of GPS tracking devices and navigation systems. Although GPS jammers or blockers are functional, they have a limited operational range.
Operating a vehicle while using a mobile phone can pose serious threats to life. Numerous studies have illustrated the significant dangers that arise when drivers use mobile phones while driving. The act of engaging with a mobile device distracts the driver’s eyes from the road. In addition, GPS signal jammers can be readily impacted by electronic components, just as mobile phone signals can be disrupted.
GPS signal jammers can block signals within a certain range, causing all communication devices within the range to lose signals. Installing a GPS signal jammer on a car allows buyers to easily find their cars on the GPS monitoring management platform. As we all know, such a good product has also been found loopholes by criminals. If you buy a GPS signal jammer from the Internet, then when stealing a car, there will be no signal in the car, and the vehicle will be offline on the service platform, as if its whereabouts are unknown, and no matter how you find it, you can't find it. This is one function of the GPS signal jammer. Another main function of the GPS signal jammer is to cut off the signal of hidden GPS tracking devices and protect our private information.
Legal use of GPS signal jammers, some criminals like to use GPS signal jammers to steal cars, causing some social problems. For example, some ultra-long standby GPS locators can only call once a day, and after waking up, they will immediately return the precise positioning information of the vehicle to the buyer's network platform, and then go into sleep mode. Without any signal, car thieves can't detect it at all! In addition, it does not require wireless network installation. There is no wiring on the surface of the machine, and it can be placed anywhere on the vehicle (if it is not required to be placed in a signal shielding area). The project security is very hidden. Of course, GPS blockers equipment is mainly used to defeat hidden GPS tracking kits.
Do you believe that high-level meetings within your company do not provide enough privacy? Are you looking for ways to prevent being recorded by others in public or at home? The most effective solution to this issue is to use a mobile phone signal jammer.
The functioning of a mobile phone jammer kit is based on the interference or blockage of signals from nearby mobile phones, which stops these devices from transmitting or receiving information. Nonetheless, there are various aspects to consider when opting for a mobile phone jammer.
The initial factor to assess is the price. The cost is influenced by the level of technology of the jammer you require and the additional features you wish to incorporate. Typically, mobile phone jammers that simply block signals are more economical than other types, including wireless and remote control jammers. It is also worth noting that a wider coverage area generally leads to an increase in price.
Alternatively, before you proceed with the purchase of a cell phone signal jammer, it is crucial to understand the operating frequency of the device. In the United States and Canada, for example, the frequencies are 850MHz and 1900MHz. Hence, it is essential to pay attention to this aspect to avoid acquiring an unsuitable cell phone signal jammer.
This device may resemble a walkie-talkie, but its capabilities are more significant than one might expect. When a cell phone jammer is turned on, it can disrupt all cellular communications in the area. The use of such a jammer is not only a federal offense but can also result in a fine of $16,000 and possible imprisonment.
Still, Eric from Philadelphia was not stopped, having become tired of the incessant cell phone chatter on SEPTA's 44 bus. When he does not wish to hear the conversations, he activates a signal jammers, according to NBC 10 in Philadelphia.
Eric stated to NBC 10 that a considerable number of individuals are very vocal and lack an awareness of privacy. When he senses that they are being bothersome, he tightens the antenna and turns on the switch.
Eric argues that he did not know it was unlawful to disrupt cell phone signals, considering it a "gray area." He expressed the understanding that the legal restrictions were applicable only to television or radio signals.
Yet, he remains unrepentant regarding his conduct.
He told NBC 10, "I have a personal investment in law enforcement, and quite frankly, I take pride in that."
The jammers referenced in this case are illegal, primarily because they prevent cell phone communications during emergencies and also disrupt other critical signals, including those used by police radios and various two-way communication systems.
After realizing that the jammer was illegal, Eric conveyed his plans to eliminate the device he had purchased, which ABC News estimated to have a value of $300.
The fundamental issue, however, is that Eric is not the only one who is practicing this jamming technique.
The report from Forbes reveals that individuals in the New Jersey and New York areas are also employing these devices. Eric's situation may serve to remind them of the legal restrictions surrounding the use of such powerful technology.
Two individuals from China employed remote-controlled signal jammers to perpetrate sophisticated thefts at highway rest stops. They were apprehended by law enforcement on the scene, which led to the discovery of a method for stealing funds from credit cards associated with a call center gang.
The police department in Chachoengsao has documented several theft occurrences at the Bang Pakong highway rest area, where vehicles have been forcibly entered and valuables, especially credit cards, have been taken. This has resulted in considerable distress for those traveling along this route.
The police in Bang Pakong, Chachoengsao, have partnered with the Central Investigation Police to rapidly pursue the criminals. They have gathered essential evidence from the CCTV footage available at each of the crime locations.
The individuals suspected of involvement appear to be Chinese, frequently utilizing a similar method of operation. They are organized as a gang with a distinct allocation of duties, notably between Zhang, who is 38, and Zheng, who is 31.
On September 15, the investigative efforts at the crime scene were concluded, leading to the joint arrest of two Chinese suspects at a highway service area in Khao Din Town, located in Bang Pakong District, Chachoengsao Province.
Realizing the clear pattern in the criminals' actions, the officers positioned themselves throughout the area for surveillance. When the two men arrived, the police decided to wait until they attempted to break into two vehicles before they revealed themselves and made the arrests.
The police then carried out a search of their room, revealing various items used in the crime, including a remote control signal jammers, three mobile phones, a shoulder bag, and they confiscated a car key, a vehicle, and other significant evidence.
The pair was charged with "jointly attempting to commit theft with a vehicle" and "illegally entering and residing in Saudi Arabia as foreign nationals." While Zhang denied the charges, Zheng accepted them. They were then transferred to the Crime Suppression Department for investigation.
The analysis showed that the gang would lie in wait near parking areas at highway rest stops. Upon seeing victims parked and ready to exit their cars, the first group of thieves would use cell phone blockers to interfere with the remote control signal, making it impossible for the victims to lock their vehicles.
Subsequently, another group of offenders would approach the victims and engage in phone conversations nearby to divert their focus, thereby preventing them from noticing that their vehicles were unsecured. Once the victims had left their cars, a different group of criminals would then open the doors and abscond with the valuables located within.
Furthermore, it was revealed by the police that a Thai woman, later confirmed to be Zheng's girlfriend, Ms. Ketfa Theeranat, 20 years of age, had been traveling in the same car as the suspect before being taken to the highway rest area.
In a search carried out in Ms. Ketfa Theeranat's apartment in the Rama 9 District, police discovered ketamine. She was subsequently arrested on the charge of "unauthorized possession of psychotropic drugs (ketamine)" and was taken to Makkasan Police Station for processing.
At the same time, law enforcement agencies discovered the methods the suspects used to extract money from the victims' credit cards. The card readers they utilized were believed to be associated with foreign retailers or areas of operation. This finding is consistent with the investigation's information, suggesting a possible connection between the criminal group and the call center gang involved in defrauding multiple networks.
We will continue our investigation into the case to ensure the accuracy of these findings.
What do you need to know about the growing crime of electronic devices – ‘key jammers’ – that prevent cars from locking?
Such transmitters are easily accessible for online purchase and are used to interfere with the signal from the key fob. This means that careless drivers may mistakenly think their vehicle is secure, when it is, in fact, at risk.
This circumstance permits the potential for theft of your belongings or, in some cases, your vehicle.
The range of a low-powered signal jammers can be as much as 75 meters, which means that a large area, such as a full parking lot, can be simultaneously impacted.
Conversely, perpetrators equipped with wifi blocker can carry out their actions in numerous places, not just within the confines of public parking lots.
Upon rising to get ready for my employment, I exited the house and found that all the car doors were shut tight.
I was quite surprised when I realized that I had locked the car, as I was at my boyfriend's residence and had left my Christmas presents inside. However, when we investigated further, we found that the entire car had been turned upside down, and all valuables had been stolen.
The police first asserted that there was nothing they could do in this matter. They refrained from sending someone to investigate for fingerprints, as there were no apparent signs of a break-in. However, upon my call to the bank to cancel my card, I learned that the thief had been using my contactless card. This prompted a more serious response from the police, who then became more actively involved.
They are engaged in a review of the CCTV surveillance in an effort to track down the offenders.
To accurately determine if a car is locked, one must perform a manual check. Typically, vehicles provide other indicators of lock status, such as flashing lights, retracted mirrors, or a short honk of the horn.
If you are within a close range of the car, you may also notice the sound of the central locking engaging.
Deputy Chief Superintendent Jukes pointed out that it is essential for the public to be vigilant concerning electronic intrusions of this sort.
It is essential for individuals to be proactive in safeguarding their vehicles and belongings to discourage criminal activity. This includes the practice of manually checking that the vehicle is locked and ensuring that all valuables are taken with them when they leave.
For a more innovative method of safeguarding your vehicle, consider acquiring a car jam detector, a device that will sound an alarm upon the detection of a jam.
Ms. Dover highlighted a troubling situation for victims, indicating that they not only lose their possessions but also have no evidence to confirm that they forgot to lock their car. The majority of insurance companies will not provide coverage for theft if the vehicle is left unattended and unlocked.
The Financial Ombudsman has noted that a considerable amount of insurers do not extend coverage for theft in cases where the vehicle is left unlocked and unattended.
To confirm that a car lock is jammed, it is necessary to apprehend the thief; nonetheless, a pattern of thefts can act as persuasive evidence.
An inquiry is underway by Thames Valley Police into 14 recent thefts of lorries, vans, and cars, characterized by the absence of “obvious signs of break-in.”
In the concluding weeks of November, a spate of thefts transpired at service stations positioned along the M4 motorway in Berkshire.