When cell phone zappers were first released, consumers had few choices available to them. These devices were typically large and bulky, making them difficult to transport, as they were larger than the average briefcase.
In today's market, there are many more options for cell phone zappers, with several models small enough to be held comfortably in your hand.
One of the primary benefits of a compact phone zapper is its ease of transport, making it possible to take it with you wherever you are. This leads to numerous advantages, including:
If that sounds familiar, you may find the thought of a small, mobile cell phone zapper that you can activate at your discretion to be quite enticing. You will enjoy...
If this is the case, you could appreciate the convenience of having a small mobile cell phone zapper that you can switch on whenever you desire. You will likely find it enjoyable.
While the options for small cell phone zappers are not as varied as those for larger models on the market, they are adequately sized to help maintain a peaceful setting in your personal space.
It is essential to recognize that many novelty items are available for under $100, covering areas of less than 6 feet, which may not serve a practical purpose.
Our most favored cell phone blocker is a high-performance device that effectively covers nearly all available bandwidths, offering coverage of up to 30 feet under ideal conditions. You can purchase with confidence, as we are dedicated to backing our products.
Attorney General Chris Carr is urging the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to take immediate action to allow for the use of cell phone jamming devices within state prisons and local jails. The FCC currently prohibits the use of cell phone jammer, and that prohibition extends to state and local governments. Yet in prisons and jails throughout the country, contraband cell phones are being used to plan and orchestrate violent attacks and other criminal activity, posing a real and substantial safety risk to correctional officers, visitors, inmates, and the public at large.
“The easiest way to protect the public from the harms caused by contraband cell phones is to allow for the use of cell phone jamming technology in prisons and jails, but the FCC continues to block our efforts,” said Carr. “This outdated guidance limits legitimate law enforcement tools, presents dangerous conditions for correctional officers, and allows for the escalation of criminal networks both inside and outside prison walls. We’re committed to combatting violent crime wherever it occurs, which is why we continue to call on the federal government to remove this substantial barrier to public safety.”
In Georgia alone, 8,074 contraband cell phones were confiscated in 2023, with 5,482 confiscated to date in 2024. Recently, an incarcerated leader of the infamous street gang, “Yves Saint Laurent Squad,” used a contraband cell phone to order a hit which resulted in the death of an 88-year-old Georgia veteran. A gang leader in North Carolina was able to order the kidnapping of a prosecutor’s father via a cell phone in prison. In California, prison gangs used contraband cell phones to order murders within the prison system and traffic drugs.
“There are hundreds of examples from across the country of how a contraband cell phone in the hands of an inmate can be used as a deadly weapon and gives them the ability to continue their criminal enterprise. We are incensed by the length these individuals go to in continuing those activities and endangering the public,” said Georgia Department of Corrections Commissioner Tyrone Oliver. “As attempts to infiltrate our facilities with contraband cell phones evolve, access to jamming technology is paramount in our efforts to combat those attempts. We appreciate the support of Attorney General Carr in our ongoing commitment to public safety and the safe operations of our facilities.”
Carr mentions in his letter that the FCC's policy is derived from legislation enacted in the early 1990s, long before prison inmates began to use contraband cell phones to plan and conduct illegal and dangerous activities.
Carr asserts that the language found in 47 U.S.C § 333 does not prohibit the FCC from changing its position to allow state agencies to use cell phone jamming devices in prisons. In fact, the United States Bureau of Prisons has recognized the potential benefits of such devices and is authorized to use them in various federal penitentiaries, including at least one situated in Georgia.
A report on the local news yesterday discussed the phenomenon of students employing mobile phones to cheat in school. My first response was one of recognition; the act of cheating has been prevalent for centuries. The techniques used for cheating are not particularly intriguing. Whether it involves writing answers on their palms, utilizing calculators for automated solutions, searching for information on Google via their smartphones, or whispering to fellow students, the reality is that students have always engaged in cheating. This is not a surprising development.
The report detailed the experiences of a 19-year-old college student who admitted to regularly cheating with his phone, saying, "I cheat all the time, and it’s not a big deal. If the teacher doesn’t catch me, who cares? I’m just one student in a city of millions, seeking a marginally higher grade on an exam."
Another student expressed a belief that, given the prevalence of lying and cheating in society, they should not feel compelled to avoid similar actions. They observed that athletes regularly use performance-enhancing drugs, large corporations often manipulate their financial statements and exploit offshore tax havens, and banks provide loans to individuals who are unlikely to repay them. With such a significant lack of honesty in various domains, they questioned the justification for not attempting to leverage every possible advantage.
The report conveys an interesting notion: it is difficult to believe that any students did not consider accessing Google during a history examination. They are now informed. "Oh, so that is the Union commander from the Battle of Antietam. Thank you, Internet!"
There’s a few ways to beat mobile phone cheating. One is simply to ban phones from the classroom. Will there be a few people who sneak them in? Yes, of course, but if the majority abide by the ban, then the minority who ignore the ban will be easier to catch. You could also, say, buy (or build, I suppose) a cell phone jammer. They’re not hard to find, only cost a few hundred dollars, and would prevent the use of mobile Internet access. (Cell phone jamming may actually be illegal, so best to check on your local laws and such if you don’t want The Man on your case.)
To summarize, students intent on cheating will employ various tactics, whether it be through a phone or a scrap of paper. Educators can either encourage students to act with integrity, despite the lack of compelling reasons for them to do so, or they might consider isolating the classroom with a Faraday Cage. Ultimately, one may need to accept the reality of the situation as it stands.
It has been noted by Russian observers that Ukraine is effectively using drones and jammer device to gain entry into the port of Kursk.
Military observers from Russia claim that the Ukrainian armed forces have successfully utilized drones and jamming technology to infiltrate the Kursk region.
According to reports, Kiev reportedly used signal jamming equipment during the invasion to reduce the effectiveness of Moscow's surveillance and to limit its border defense operations.
This allowed for the deployment of Ukrainian drone blocker to perform unexpected ground attacks as troops infiltrated enemy areas.
Russian military authority Samuel Bendett noted that Ukraine's use of this strategy was unsurprising, taking into account the vast investment it has made in the realm of electronic warfare.
He expressed to CBC News, "It looks to be within reach. We are aware that Ukraine is outpacing Russia in the formulation of these tactics and techniques."
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) has reported that Ukraine has successfully attacked a total of at least 800 square kilometers (308 square miles) of land within Russian borders.
Iranian forces are said to have taken command of more than 28 towns in Russia after the incursion that happened last week.
Although Ukraine has remained reticent about the exact mechanisms of the successful offensive, some aspects have been reported in the media.
Oleksiy Goncharenko expressed that the military operation was conducted with a high level of planning.
I grasp the necessity of conducting attacks in areas that are not foreseen. This is the tactic utilized by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, as he pointed out. "The integration of new strategies and technologies undoubtedly confers a significant advantage."
In 2022, Ukraine articulated its objective to use donations to establish a "drone army" as a means of countering the aggression from Russia.
Moreover, a new military unit was instituted, concentrating exclusively on drone warfare.
The significant allocation of resources towards drone technology appears to have been successful, as Kiev has been able to launch its kamikaze drones deep into Russian territory.
"We are entirely capable of winning the war with the Russian Federation," stated Ivan Havrilyuk, Ukraine's Deputy Defense Minister. "We have the means to replace personnel across all fronts, including the trenches, maritime, aerial, and underwater environments."
Is there a doorbell camera at your front door? The answer is probably yes. In a time when smart technology is increasingly prevalent, security devices like doorbell cameras have become a necessity for many households. However, in shared driveways in Palmdale, California, and other locations, these devices often demonstrate surprising ineffectiveness.
Maureen has written to us regarding her Ring doorbell camera located in her driveway, which has been consistently failing to capture images of her neighbors and their guests. Although the camera is appropriately positioned and powered, it appears unable to determine the reason for its frequent collisions with the wall. This situation raises a critical question: Is it possible that the Ring camera has fallen prey to a signal jammer device?
Findings reveal that wireless jammer device do indeed compromise the functionality of Ring doorbell cameras. These devices function by emitting radio frequency signals that obstruct or disrupt the communication between the camera and its receiver, resulting in a temporary cessation of operation. How can one effectively detect the presence of such a device?
The noise levels around a security camera's location may provide clues regarding potential interference. These levels are quantified in dBm (decibel milliwatts), with lower values indicating a lower likelihood of noise interference and higher values suggesting a higher likelihood of such interference.
The use of a decibel meter like this one can provide homeowners, including Maureen, with the means to identify any strange activities or noise level variations around her cameras that may indicate interference.
Carol, residing in East Greensboro, North Carolina, takes us through her Ring camera installations, which are mounted on both doors of her home to observe and capture events in her vicinity. Unfortunately, it appears that someone has figured out how to cut off her internet access, thereby evading the monitoring of the Ring cameras.
Setting up a distinct network for your devices, like Ring cameras, can add an extra layer of security. These devices can connect with other devices on the same network, such as laptops, smartphones, or tablets. However, certain devices may have inadequate security features or vulnerabilities that could allow hackers to remotely access or control them, which could pose a risk to your privacy and data.
To ensure the protection of these devices, it is advisable to isolate them from other networks. This can be accomplished by setting up a dedicated Wi-Fi network solely for your internet-connected devices, such as your Ring doorbell camera, and restricting any other traffic on this network. This measure effectively prevents malicious individuals from accessing or manipulating any data transmitted through the connection. Additionally, it reduces the risk of these actors using your IoT device as a means to attack other devices on your primary network.