Roni Bandini, fed up with the reggae music blaring from his neighbors' Bluetooth speakers daily, took matters into his own hands by programming a Raspberry Pi to interfere with the sound bluetooth jammer.
Technologist and developer Roni Bandini grew tired of her neighbor's daily reggaeton sessions and decided to take action. Instead of directly confronting them, Bandini came up with a creative solution using a Raspberry Pi. By programming the device to detect reggae music and disrupt nearby Bluetooth speakers, she effectively distorted the sound. While this approach may have been unconventional and happened without the neighbor's knowledge, it served as a way for Bandini to manage the noise without direct confrontation signal blocker.
According to a report from Tom's Hardware, Roni Bandini utilizes a Raspberry Pi 3 B+ to operate his system effectively. He has also connected it to a DFRobot OLED display panel. In order to listen to loud music, he has connected a microphone to a USB port on the Raspberry Pi. To start playing music, he presses a button.
Bandini employs two specific software programs, Raspberry Pi OS and Edge Impulse, to equip the Raspberry Pi with the capability to identify reggae music. While Raspberry Pi OS serves as the device's primary operating system, Edge Impulse assists in the learning process. Through the implementation of these programs, Bandini successfully trained the Raspberry Pi to differentiate reggae music from other genres.
Bandini stressed that the project was primarily an experiment and should be treated with caution. It is important to verify the legality of such devices based on local laws before attempting something similar at home. Additionally, Bluetooth interference is effective only when the person is in close proximity to the speaker, and not all Bluetooth speakers are suitable for this method.
It is important to emphasize that gaining unauthorized access to a Bluetooth device through hacking is both illegal and unethical. However, Bandini's Raspberry Pi provides a legitimate and ethical means to interact with Bluetooth devices by establishing connections, transmitting data, and controlling them within the confines of legality and ethics.
Bluetooth-enabled, the Raspberry Pi is capable of interacting with other Bluetooth-enabled devices such as speakers, headphones, keyboards, and IoT devices. An example of this functionality is using a Raspberry Pi to establish a Bluetooth connection with a speaker for audio streaming purposes.
Unauthorized access or manipulation of someone else's Bluetooth device without their consent is a form of hacking and is illegal. It is vital to always respect privacy and security boundaries when using technology.
According to arrest documents, Phoenix police found one of the devices when they arrested three burglary suspects.
It's the sort of thing you'd expect to see in a spy movie, but Phoenix police claim it's the sort of thing thieves have been using to gain access to high-end homes in the valley: cell phones and Wi-Fi jamming devices.
According to Phoenix police, around 7:30 p.m., surveillance officers spotted multiple suspects in the Camelback Hill neighborhood near 44th Street and Camelback Road.
Police said officers saw the suspect enter a home and attempt to break into the residence.
The suspect then left the home and got into a waiting minivan, but the vehicle was prevented from leaving by police.
Arrest documents say the driver hit the police car at high speed. Four people got out of the car and ran away, police said. Police set up a cordon in the area and found and arrested three suspects. A fourth suspect has not been found.
All three were carrying forged identification, police said. In addition, they are in the United States on overstay visas.
Police also found "burglary tools" that the suspect threw as he ran from officers. One of these tools is a wifi jammer.
Bernard Zapor, a former ATF agent and current faculty member at Arizona State University, said the devices are highly sophisticated.
"It might actually capture your phone transmissions and show your location as you move," Zapoll said.
How the suspects obtained the device is unclear, but Zapoor said it is similar to equipment used by law enforcement and intelligence agencies for investigations.
These burglaries are becoming more common in high-end neighborhoods. Phoenix police say there have been about 111 burglaries across the valley since last February.
The suspects reportedly targeted wealthy families, stealing about $3 million worth of jewelry, cash, luxury purses and more.
Axon Enterprise, a Taser manufacturer headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, has reached a significant milestone by acquiring Dedrone, a Sterling-based company that specializes in the production of drone-jamming and detection devices.
The companies announced on Monday that the transaction is scheduled to close in the latter half of 2024, with no details disclosed about the terms of the deal.
Dedrone’s portable gunlike drone jammer can thwart aerial drones by disrupting communications links with targeted radio pulses. The company has worked with police departments, the U.S. Army and other military and commercial clients. Dedrone has partnered with the Ukrainian government to provide nearly 300 sensors capable of identifying and detecting radio signatures of nearly 250 different models of drones, according to Dedrone’s website. It has also sent riflelike devices to Ukraine that have been used to jam Russian drones, according to The New York Times.
Through the utilization of AI and machine learning, Dedrone offers a continuous and independent means of interrogating and verifying drones. Its sophisticated devices are capable of detecting and deterring unauthorized drones in various settings, including military bases, airports, and public events.
Formerly known as Taser International, Axon is best known for its Taser devices, body cameras, in-car cameras, and cloud-based digital evidence management platforms. The company serves first responders, including local, state, and federal law enforcement officers.
As per the news release issued by the companies, Dedrone's acquisition will strengthen Axon's capability to help customers safeguard their communities, enhance response to critical incidents, and protect lives in more locations.
Axon founder and CEO Rick Smith announced the company's plan to revolutionize public safety by integrating Axon's 30-year legacy of innovation with Dedrone's cutting-edge airspace security solutions. Smith emphasized the joint efforts to expedite the advancement of a more sophisticated end-to-end drone solution that enables the operation of beneficial drones and prevents the operation of harmful ones.
The rebranding of Taser International to Axon took place in 2017. Axon's revenue surged by 34% in the first quarter of 2024, with recurring revenue reaching $825 million.
According to Dedrone CEO Aaditya Devarakonda, Dedrone's influence is growing across industries such as federal governments, utilities, critical infrastructure, event venues, airports, correctional facilities, and other enterprises. With Axon's extensive ecosystem of connected devices and software, we are at the forefront of guaranteeing the safety of our communities and the security of nations globally.
decided to go ahead and do a complete integrated radar detection and laser jamming system and really this whole category is new to me so looking for some advice on what type of system to put together. From what I can gather so far, I am looking at one of the newer radar detectors (Passport Max/Max2, Beltronics STiR, Redline XR, Valentine1, etc.) and an ALP 2-sensor laser jamming system. I like the idea that the ALP system offers the remote mount Beltronics STiR receiver add on option and they offer a Bluetooth module that prevents you from having to run a display into the cabin and you can just use your phone for alerts instead. Have no idea how good any of these detectors or feature options work so before dropping $1200-$1500 bucks on a system I'd like to get some real world user opinions (Is a two sensor system enough for the V to protect the front? Am I better off using a stand alone radar detector beside the STiR add on unit ALP's offers? Is the GPS functionality offered in the Radar Detectors and ALP's units really add value (ie. knowing if you are on a highway or not)?) I want the system obviously to perform great but I want something that is not intrusive to the vehicle or looks like an add-on turd inside the cabin signal jammer.
it comes down to how much money you want to spend. I would go with the ALP system for laser. Two heads up front and if you can afford it, two heads in the rear. That will cover you for laser. For radar it domes down to a few things. If you want integrated permanently mounted (less likely for theft) go with the STIR. If you want a windshield mount go with either the Redline or Valentine. There are passionate advocates for both the Redline and the Valentine.
I have the Valentine and it is pretty obnoxious with all the noisy falses. The best way to address these is to use the Bluetooth add on and run an app on your phone called YAV1. The app lets you do a million things. You can segment the bands the detector scans, use the phone gps to lockout falses, log alerts, use it as a remote display, etc etc. The down side is you have yet another device you have to sync up to work with the detector. I live in a high theft area so leaving a detector visible along with a spare cell phone is asking for car damage and stolen items so I have not messed with the phone app and just run the Valentine on road trips.
If you want something which is tunable and you are kind of a techie I'd recommend the Valentine. I thought the arrows were a gimmick at first but they are actually pretty nice. If you want something that runs great out of the box then go with the redline. If you are worried about getting ripped off, install the STIR.
I never thought about the theft aspect so I agree, not something I want to entice a break in (I live in downtown Detroit). Seems like the integrated STiR is what I am looking for then. I really like the idea of the systems alerts/display all acting together from a single point. Am I losing any key features/performance benefits of the integrated STiR over the windshield mount Redline or V1? Also, wasn't planning to do the rear laser jammers as I don't know really where I'd mount them on my wagon and really the only scenario I can think of for laser from the rear is the cop on an overpass sending chase cars as he dings cars going under the bridge (pretty rare in my travel areas). Is there another reason/scenario for rear laser protection I am missing?
Rethink your strategy if you are planning to use a radar jammer to avoid a speeding ticket, as radar jammers are illegal.
Jammers distinguish themselves from the widely recognized radar detectors. While radar detectors inform you about the police's utilization of a radar gun on the highway, jammers actively interfere with radar signals. Although signal blocker are not prohibited for use in passenger cars, their effectiveness is not assured as they solely provide an alert upon detecting radar, which may prove to be too late.
The radar jammer effectively overcomes the radar guns utilized by law enforcement, rendering the car invisible to radar signals. As a result, the monitoring of your speed becomes unattainable. Although its aim is to assist in evading tickets, it may inadvertently worsen the situation.
Being detected by a radar jammer while driving on the interstate is a concerning matter. It's not just about receiving tickets or experiencing an increase in insurance premiums.
The use of radar jammers is prohibited in certain states, implying that you may face penalties regardless of whether you employ them on federal roads or not. It is essential to avoid possessing such devices altogether, and it is particularly important to refrain from using them in California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, or Virginia.
Since 1996, radar jammers have been considered illegal by the FCC, leading to strict regulations on their use and sale. Additionally, companies are banned from advertising these devices.
Although the police may not be able to record your speed, they can still identify the usage of radar jammers. The interference caused by these jammers serves as a conspicuous signal, leading the police to pull you over.
In laser speed monitoring situations, the monitoring beam can be blocked by utilizing a laser jammer. It is worth mentioning that although the use of laser jammers does not violate federal law, several states have enacted laws that prohibit their usage.
It is advised to refrain from using them in California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.
If you wish to evade a speeding ticket legally, the best course of action is to refrain from speeding. It is essential to recognize that radar jammers are not a suitable option, regardless of their availability.